arkivoAPI

SSDs / Compare

Lexar NM790 vs Sandisk Optimus GX 7100

31 of 55 fields differ

Download CSVDownload JSON
  • 16 different values
  • 15 known for one only
  • 10 the same
  • 14 missing for both

Biggest differences

Each bar uses the scale of all 84 SSDs.

  1. Random 4K write (claimed)A: 900,000IOPSB: 1,400,000IOPSSandisk is 500,000 IOPS higher.
  2. EnduranceA: 1,500TBB: 1,200TBLexar is 300 TB higher.

Weight

0 to 150 g

A6g
B5.8g

All 63 fields

Every value links to where we found it.

ALexar NM790
BSandisk Optimus GX 7100

General

5 of 9 differ
Model numbers
Predecessor
Not available
Not available
Successor
Not available
Not available
Launch price (EU)
Not available
Not available
Markets
Not available
Not available
Form factor

Interface

1 of 5 differ
Detachable cable
Not available
Not available

Hardware

3 of 7 differ
DRAM cache
DRAM cache size
Not available
Not available
Component sides

Performance

3 of 4 differ

Endurance and reliability

3 of 3 differ

Power

3 of 6 differ
Power while reading (claimed)
Not available
Power while writing (claimed)
Not available
Max power consumption (claimed)
Not available
Not available
Average power in light use (claimed)
Not available
Not available
Idle power (claimed)
Not available
Not available

Measured

6 of 9 differ
Sequential write (measured)
Not available
Random 4K read at queue depth 1 (measured)
Not available
Random 4K write at queue depth 1 (measured)
Not available
Write cache size (measured)
Not available
Not available
3DMark Storage Benchmark
Not available
Not available
Idle power (measured)
Not available
Not available

Cooling and build

1 of 4 differ
RGB lighting
Not available
Not available
Dust and water rating
Not available
Not available
Drop test height
Not available
Not available

Security and software

2 of 2 differ

Compatibility

1 of 1 differ

Dimensions and weight

2 of 2 differ

In the box

1 of 2 differ
Cables included
Not available
Not available

Warranty

0 of 1 differ

Both are also in the API. Back to all SSDs.