arkivoAPI

SSDs / Compare

Kingston KC3000 vs Sandisk Optimus GX PRO 850P

33 of 55 fields differ

Download CSVDownload JSON
  • 24 different values
  • 9 known for one only
  • 10 the same
  • 12 missing for both

Biggest differences

Each bar uses the scale of all 84 SSDs.

  1. EnduranceA: 1,600TBB: 1,200TBKingston is 400 TB higher.
  2. Random 4K read (claimed)A: 1,000,000IOPSB: 1,200,000IOPSSandisk is 200,000 IOPS higher.

Size, drawn to scale

Front and side.

Weight

0 to 150 g

A9.7g
B24g

All 63 fields

Every value links to where we found it.

AKingston KC3000
BSandisk Optimus GX PRO 850P

General

5 of 9 differ
Model numbers
Predecessor
Not available
Not available
Successor
Not available
Not available
Markets
Not available
Not available
Colours
Not available
Not available

Interface

0 of 5 differ
Detachable cable
Not available
Not available

Hardware

5 of 7 differ
Flash layers
Not available
DRAM cache

Performance

4 of 4 differ
Random 4K write (claimed)

Endurance and reliability

3 of 3 differ

Power

3 of 6 differ
Power while reading (claimed)
Not available
Not available
Power while writing (claimed)
Not available
Not available
Average power in light use (claimed)
Not available
Idle power (claimed)
Not available
Sleep power (claimed)
Not available
Not available

Measured

7 of 9 differ
Random 4K read at queue depth 1 (measured)
Random 4K write at queue depth 1 (measured)
Write speed after the cache (measured)
3DMark Storage Benchmark
Not available
Not available

Cooling and build

1 of 4 differ
RGB lighting
Not available
Not available
Dust and water rating
Not available
Not available
Drop test height
Not available
Not available

Security and software

1 of 2 differ
Security
Not available
Not available

Compatibility

1 of 1 differ

Dimensions and weight

2 of 2 differ

In the box

1 of 2 differ
Cables included
Not available
Not available

Warranty

0 of 1 differ
Manufacturer warranty (source market)

Both are also in the API. Back to all SSDs.