arkivoAPI

SSDs / Compare

Kingston KC3000 vs Samsung 990 PRO

37 of 55 fields differ

Download CSVDownload JSON
  • 27 different values
  • 10 known for one only
  • 11 the same
  • 7 missing for both

Biggest differences

Each bar uses the scale of all 84 SSDs.

  1. Random 4K write (claimed)A: 1,000,000IOPSB: 1,550,000IOPSSamsung is 550,000 IOPS higher.
  2. Random 4K read (claimed)A: 1,000,000IOPSB: 1,400,000IOPSSamsung is 400,000 IOPS higher.
  3. EnduranceA: 1,600TBB: 1,200TBKingston is 400 TB higher.
  4. Write speed after the cacheA: 1,600MB/sB: 1,400MB/sKingston is 200 MB/s higher.

Weight

0 to 150 g

A9.7g
B9g

All 63 fields

Every value links to where we found it.

AKingston KC3000
BSamsung 990 PRO

General

5 of 9 differ
Series
Not available
Not available
Successor
Not available
Markets
Not available
Not available
Form factor
Capacity

Interface

1 of 5 differ
PCIe generation
Detachable cable
Not available
Not available

Hardware

3 of 7 differ
DRAM cache

Performance

4 of 4 differ
Random 4K write (claimed)

Endurance and reliability

2 of 3 differ

Power

6 of 6 differ
Power while reading (claimed)
Not available
Power while writing (claimed)
Not available
Max power consumption (claimed)
Average power in light use (claimed)
Not available
Idle power (claimed)
Sleep power (claimed)
Not available

Measured

8 of 9 differ
Random 4K read at queue depth 1 (measured)
Random 4K write at queue depth 1 (measured)
3DMark Storage Benchmark
Not available
Not available
Highest temperature under load (measured)
Not available

Cooling and build

2 of 4 differ
Dust and water rating
Not available
Not available
Drop test height
Not available
Not available

Security and software

2 of 2 differ
Security
Not available

Compatibility

1 of 1 differ

Dimensions and weight

2 of 2 differ

In the box

1 of 2 differ
Cables included
Not available
Not available

Warranty

0 of 1 differ
Manufacturer warranty (source market)

Both are also in the API. Back to all SSDs.