arkivoAPI

SSDs / Compare

Kingston KC3000 vs Seagate FireCuda 530

27 of 55 fields differ

Download CSVDownload JSON
  • 18 different values
  • 9 known for one only
  • 18 the same
  • 10 missing for both

Biggest differences

Each bar uses the scale of all 84 SSDs.

  1. Write speed after the cacheA: 1,600MB/sB: 3,850MB/sSeagate is 2,250 MB/s higher.
  2. EnduranceA: 1,600TBB: 2,550TBSeagate is 950 TB higher.

Weight

0 to 150 g

A9.7g
B10g

All 63 fields

Every value links to where we found it.

AKingston KC3000
BSeagate FireCuda 530

General

4 of 9 differ
Series
Not available
Not available
Model numbers
Predecessor
Not available
Not available
Successor
Not available
Not available
Markets
Not available
Not available
Colours
Not available
Not available
Form factor
Capacity

Interface

0 of 5 differ
Detachable cable
Not available
Not available

Hardware

0 of 7 differ
DRAM cache

Performance

2 of 4 differ
Random 4K write (claimed)

Endurance and reliability

1 of 3 differ

Power

6 of 6 differ
Power while writing (claimed)
Not available
Average power in light use (claimed)
Not available
Idle power (claimed)

Measured

8 of 9 differ
Random 4K read at queue depth 1 (measured)
Random 4K write at queue depth 1 (measured)
3DMark Storage Benchmark
Not available
Not available
Highest temperature under load (measured)
Not available

Cooling and build

1 of 4 differ
RGB lighting
Not available
Not available
Dust and water rating
Not available
Not available
Drop test height
Not available
Not available

Security and software

1 of 2 differ
Security
Not available
Not available

Compatibility

1 of 1 differ

Dimensions and weight

2 of 2 differ

In the box

1 of 2 differ
Cables included
Not available
Not available

Warranty

0 of 1 differ
Manufacturer warranty (source market)

Both are also in the API. Back to all SSDs.