arkivoAPI

SSDs / Compare

Biwin Black Opal NV7400 vs Samsung 990 EVO Plus

33 of 55 fields differ

Download CSVDownload JSON
  • 17 different values
  • 16 known for one only
  • 13 the same
  • 9 missing for both

Biggest differences

Each bar uses the scale of all 84 SSDs.

  1. Write speed after the cacheA: 2,600MB/sB: 1,500MB/sBiwin is 1,100 MB/s higher.
  2. EnduranceA: 2,000TBB: 1,200TBBiwin is 800 TB higher.
  3. Random 4K write (claimed)A: 900,000IOPSB: 1,350,000IOPSSamsung is 450,000 IOPS higher.

Weight

0 to 150 g

A9g
B9g

All 63 fields

Every value links to where we found it.

ABiwin Black Opal NV7400
BSamsung 990 EVO Plus

General

6 of 9 differ
Predecessor
Not available
Not available
Successor
Not available
Not available
Markets
Not available
Not available
Form factor
Capacity

Interface

2 of 5 differ
Detachable cable
Not available
Not available

Hardware

3 of 7 differ
DRAM cache size
Not available
Not available

Performance

3 of 4 differ

Endurance and reliability

1 of 3 differ

Power

5 of 6 differ
Power while reading (claimed)
Not available
Power while writing (claimed)
Not available
Average power in light use (claimed)
Not available
Not available
Idle power (claimed)
Not available
Sleep power (claimed)
Not available

Measured

8 of 9 differ
Sequential write (measured)
Not available
Random 4K read at queue depth 1 (measured)
Not available
Random 4K write at queue depth 1 (measured)
Not available
3DMark Storage Benchmark
Not available
Not available
Highest temperature under load (measured)
Not available

Cooling and build

0 of 4 differ
RGB lighting
Not available
Not available
Dust and water rating
Not available
Not available
Drop test height
Not available
Not available

Security and software

2 of 2 differ
Security
Not available

Compatibility

1 of 1 differ

Dimensions and weight

1 of 2 differ
Dimensions

In the box

1 of 2 differ
Cables included
Not available
Not available

Warranty

0 of 1 differ

Both are also in the API. Back to all SSDs.