arkivoAPI

SSDs / Compare

Samsung 990 PRO vs Seagate FireCuda 530

33 of 55 fields differ

Download CSVDownload JSON
  • 28 different values
  • 5 known for one only
  • 14 the same
  • 8 missing for both

Biggest differences

Each bar uses the scale of all 84 SSDs.

  1. Write speed after the cacheA: 1,400MB/sB: 3,850MB/sSeagate is 2,450 MB/s higher.
  2. EnduranceA: 1,200TBB: 2,550TBSeagate is 1,350 TB higher.
  3. Random 4K write (claimed)A: 1,550,000IOPSB: 1,000,000IOPSSamsung is 550,000 IOPS higher.
  4. Random 4K read (claimed)A: 1,400,000IOPSB: 1,000,000IOPSSamsung is 400,000 IOPS higher.
  5. Power while writing (claimed)Lower is betterA: 5.5WB: 7.3WSamsung is 1.8 W lower.
  6. Power while reading (claimed)Lower is betterA: 6.1WB: 7.8WSamsung is 1.7 W lower.

Weight

0 to 150 g

A9g
B10g

All 63 fields

Every value links to where we found it.

ASamsung 990 PRO
BSeagate FireCuda 530

General

5 of 9 differ
Series
Not available
Not available
Model numbers
GTIN / EAN
Successor
Not available
Launch price (EU)
Not available
Markets
Not available
Not available
Capacity

Interface

1 of 5 differ
Detachable cable
Not available
Not available

Hardware

3 of 7 differ
DRAM cache
Component sides

Performance

3 of 4 differ

Endurance and reliability

2 of 3 differ

Power

4 of 6 differ
Power while reading (claimed)
Average power in light use (claimed)
Not available
Not available
Idle power (claimed)

Measured

8 of 9 differ
Random 4K read at queue depth 1 (measured)
Random 4K write at queue depth 1 (measured)
3DMark Storage Benchmark
Not available
Not available

Cooling and build

1 of 4 differ
Dust and water rating
Not available
Not available
Drop test height
Not available
Not available

Security and software

2 of 2 differ
Security
Not available

Compatibility

1 of 1 differ

Dimensions and weight

2 of 2 differ
Dimensions
Weight

In the box

1 of 2 differ
Cables included
Not available
Not available

Warranty

0 of 1 differ
Manufacturer warranty (source market)

Both are also in the API. Back to all SSDs.