arkivoAPI

SSDs / Compare

Samsung 9100 PRO vs XPG MARS 980 BLADE

33 of 55 fields differ

Download CSVDownload JSON
  • 21 different values
  • 12 known for one only
  • 13 the same
  • 9 missing for both

Biggest differences

Each bar uses the scale of all 84 SSDs.

  1. Random 4K write (claimed)A: 2,600,000IOPSB: 1,650,000IOPSSamsung is 950,000 IOPS higher.
  2. EnduranceA: 1,200TBB: 1,480TBXPG is 280 TB higher.

Size, drawn to scale

Front and side.

Weight

0 to 150 g

A9g
B12g

All 63 fields

Every value links to where we found it.

ASamsung 9100 PRO
BXPG MARS 980 BLADE

General

5 of 9 differ
Successor
Not available
Not available
Markets
Not available
Not available
Form factor

Interface

0 of 5 differ
Interface
PCIe generation
Detachable cable
Not available
Not available

Hardware

4 of 7 differ
DRAM cache

Performance

4 of 4 differ
Random 4K write (claimed)

Endurance and reliability

2 of 3 differ

Power

4 of 6 differ
Power while reading (claimed)
Not available
Power while writing (claimed)
Not available
Max power consumption (claimed)
Not available
Not available
Average power in light use (claimed)
Not available
Not available
Idle power (claimed)
Not available
Sleep power (claimed)
Not available

Measured

8 of 9 differ
Random 4K read at queue depth 1 (measured)
Random 4K write at queue depth 1 (measured)
Write speed after the cache (measured)
Not available
3DMark Storage Benchmark
Not available
Not available
Idle power (measured)
Not available

Cooling and build

1 of 4 differ
RGB lighting
Not available
Not available
Dust and water rating
Not available
Not available
Drop test height
Not available
Not available

Security and software

2 of 2 differ
Security
Not available

Compatibility

0 of 1 differ

Dimensions and weight

2 of 2 differ

In the box

1 of 2 differ
Cables included
Not available
Not available

Warranty

0 of 1 differ
Manufacturer warranty (source market)

Both are also in the API. Back to all SSDs.