arkivoAPI

SSDs / Compare

Acer Predator GM7000 vs Samsung 990 PRO

36 of 55 fields differ

Download CSVDownload JSON
  • 25 different values
  • 11 known for one only
  • 11 the same
  • 8 missing for both

Biggest differences

Each bar uses the scale of all 84 SSDs.

  1. Write speed after the cacheA: 2,850MB/sB: 1,400MB/sAcer is 1,450 MB/s higher.
  2. Random 4K write (claimed)A: 1,100,000IOPSB: 1,550,000IOPSSamsung is 450,000 IOPS higher.
  3. EnduranceA: 1,500TBB: 1,200TBAcer is 300 TB higher.
  4. Power while reading (claimed)Lower is betterA: 5.09WB: 6.1WAcer is 1.01 W lower.
  5. Power while writing (claimed)Lower is betterA: 6.27WB: 5.5WSamsung is 0.77 W lower.

Size, drawn to scale

Front and side.

Weight

0 to 150 g

A9.8g
B9g

All 63 fields

Every value links to where we found it.

AAcer Predator GM7000
BSamsung 990 PRO

General

5 of 9 differ
Series
Not available
Not available
Successor
Not available
Launch price (EU)
Not available
Markets
Not available
Not available
Form factor
Capacity

Interface

1 of 5 differ
PCIe generation
Detachable cable
Not available
Not available

Hardware

4 of 7 differ
Component sides

Performance

4 of 4 differ
Random 4K write (claimed)

Endurance and reliability

1 of 3 differ

Power

5 of 6 differ
Average power in light use (claimed)
Not available
Not available
Idle power (claimed)
Not available
Sleep power (claimed)
Not available

Measured

8 of 9 differ
Random 4K read at queue depth 1 (measured)
Random 4K write at queue depth 1 (measured)
3DMark Storage Benchmark
Not available
Not available

Cooling and build

2 of 4 differ
Dust and water rating
Not available
Not available
Drop test height
Not available
Not available

Security and software

2 of 2 differ
Security
Not available

Compatibility

1 of 1 differ

Dimensions and weight

2 of 2 differ
Weight

In the box

1 of 2 differ
Cables included
Not available
Not available

Warranty

0 of 1 differ
Manufacturer warranty (source market)

Both are also in the API. Back to all SSDs.